A true leader would rename the Washington R*dskins right away: Chris MacDonald

It’s the honourable thing to do—and it’s the right business decision too

3
(Washington Post/Getty)

(Washington Post/Getty)

A leader has to be able to do hard things, including, perhaps especially, leading his or her organization through difficult changes. Indeed, many leadership scholars regard that as the key difference between the science of managing and the art of leading. Lots of people may be able to manage an organization competently in pursuit of well-established goals. Fewer can lead an organization when hard changes need to be made. And in the case of Daniel Snyder, the owner of a certain football team whose home base is Washington, DC, one of those hard changes should be to get on with it and change his team’s name.

Snyder has faced a groundswell of criticism over his team’s continued use of the “R*dskins” moniker. There have been vows to boycott the team and its paraphernalia. A growing list of media outlets have even vowed no longer to use the team’s current name in their coverage of the team. There’s even a Wikipedia page detailing the ethical debate over what many take to be an offensive, even racist name.

And if Snyder is going to change the team’s name (something he’s given no indication he is inclined to do), it needn’t be just because he’s worried about offending people. Two professors from Emory University have argued that there’s a good business argument for changing the team’s name. In particular, their analysis suggests that the name is bad for brand equity. “Elementary principles of brand management,” they state, “suggest dropping the team name.”

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has even entered the fray by canceling the team’s trademark registration. The PTO has rules, it seems, against trademarking racial slurs. This doesn’t mean that the team has to change its name, but it surely helps to devalue the brand and promises to reduce income from merchandising.

The whole sorry mess has the feeling of inevitability about it. The name can’t stay forever. The tide of history—and sound ethical reasoning—is against Snyder on this one. Snyder is an employer, most of whose employees are members of a historically-disadvantaged group. It is unseemly at best to resist so adamantly the pleas of members of another historically-disadvantaged group that he stop making money from a brand that adds insult to injury.

It is time for Daniel Snyder to act like a leader, to do the hard thing—the honourable thing—and change that name.


Chris MacDonald is director of the Jim Pattison Ethical Leadership Education & Research Program at the Ted Rogers School of Management

3 comments on “A true leader would rename the Washington R*dskins right away: Chris MacDonald

  1. Perhaps Mr. Snyder should consider the “WASHINGTON WHITEY’S” or how about the WASHINGTON FAT-CATS” Walter G.

    Reply

  2. We totally agree. The Washington Professional Football Team needs a new name, and Daniel Snyder needs to smarten up and do it now. We’ve got a list of some suggestions we think would work: http://bit.ly/1xgmcWf

    Reply

  3. Washington Whiteys would be ok. I don’t know any caucasians who would care. More important things to worry about.

    Reply

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *