Giant food service contractor Sodexo backtracks after bumping thousands from health plan


WASHINGTON – A giant food service company unexpectedly backtracked Thursday after bumping thousands of college cafeteria workers from its health plan and casting blame on President Barack Obama’s overhaul.

Sodexo’s experience could serve as a cautionary tale for other employers trying to pin benefit reductions on “Obamacare.” The company’s original cutbacks earlier this year fueled a union organizing drive and campus protests.

Julie Peterson, Sodexo’s vice-president for benefits, said the company will make changes for next year to restore eligibility for many of those affected.

“We think that overall this is going to result in about the same number of employees being eligible as in the past,” Peterson said.

Among those who lost their coverage through Sodexo this year was Julie Pemberton, a cashier at Curry College, a liberal arts institution near Boston.

Pemberton puts in more than 40 hours a week during the academic year. She’s paying over $200 a month more in premiums since she switched to a plan from the Massachusetts health insurance exchange.

“I’m actually looking for a new apartment because this is just draining any savings I have,” said Pemberton. “I can’t just keep paying and paying and paying.”

UNITE HERE, a labour union trying to organize Sodexo workers, said the company’s cutback was facilitated by what it calls a loophole in federal regulations carrying out the health law’s requirement that larger employers offer coverage.

The Obama administration responds that the employer, not the health care law, is to blame.

French-owned Sodexo is a multinational service company with U.S. headquarters in Maryland. It operates many college cafeterias and also provides other campus services. In January, Sodexo reclassified some of its workers as part-time by averaging their hours over a 52-week calendar year. That affected about 5,000 of its 133,000 U.S. employees.

Sodexo said it was acting to align itself with the health care law, which requires that employers with 50 or more workers offer coverage to those averaging at least 30 hours per week, or face fines.

Company official Peterson said Thursday that for benefits purposes, the company will now credit campus employees during the summer break with the hours they would have worked during the academic year.

The UNITE HERE union says federal rules require colleges and universities to essentially do the same thing for their faculty employees. But those rules don’t apply to contractor employees in cafeterias.

“There is nothing in there that says contract workers are protected,” said union spokesman Ethan Snow.

At least one college that examined the issue agreed with the cafeteria workers. Earlham College in Richmond, Indiana, recently amended its contract with Sodexo to require that the employees be offered coverage.

“Sodexo’s classification system was not consistent with the practices of other vendors, or with Earlham’s policies,” said Sena Landey, vice-president for finance at the Quaker-founded liberal arts institution.

Landey said it looks like a slip-up on the part of federal regulators.

“I think it has to be an oversight,” Landey said. “I just don’t understand why you would benefit faculty and not those on the lower end of the pay scale. I don’t see the logic in it.”

The Treasury Department, which enforces the health law’s employer coverage requirement, declined requests for an interview. Spokeswoman Erin Donar provided a statement:

“Nothing in the Affordable Care Act requires an employer to eliminate health coverage for any employees or penalizes an employer for offering health coverage to all employees. An employer that eliminates health coverage is doing so by choice, not by requirement. We are aware of concerns that have been raised regarding the treatment of employees of contractors working at educational institutions and, as always, we are considering this feedback.”

The mandate that larger employers provide health coverage is one of the most complicated parts of the health care law. Lawmakers intended it mainly as a safeguard against companies shifting their traditional responsibility for health insurance to taxpayers.

But employers across a range of industries have cited the mandate as justification for everything from limiting workers’ hours to scaling back coverage for spouses. Supporters of the law saw the requirement will have a negligible impact, since more than 90 per cent of larger employers already provide coverage.

Originally scheduled to take effect this year, the mandate has been delayed twice. Companies with 100 or more workers must comply starting next year, while businesses with 50 to 99 employees have until 2016. Smaller companies are exempt.

The law also requires individuals to carry insurance or risk fines, and that provision took effect this year.

On another issue, Sodexo and the White House are allies. This spring, the company earned official recognition by pledging to add more nutritious options to its vending and K-12 lunchroom programs in support of first lady Michelle Obama’s campaign to reduce childhood obesity.

8 comments on “Giant food service contractor Sodexo backtracks after bumping thousands from health plan

  1. This is absolutely brilliant! Congratulations on trying to revitalize the written word no texting, no email, no whatever’s next! I do not own a computer proud of being “computer free”. Maybe old fashioned, but receiving a hand written letter is planning to be so refreshing! Thank you for focusing on a rapidly declining art the hand written letter and/or note.Can’t wait around to receive my first letter! Judy Robertson

  2. Hi, the first letter was sent to my billing address, not my shipping address. I do not know if it is just me or other men and women had this trouble but I just wished to let you guys know. It was definitely disappointing not getting the letter where I’m correct now!

  3. I simply can not discover a place here to order a subscribtion to “Letters in the Mail” to get a reward or two and also for myself.It sounds like a wonderful idea and several of my mates will be delighted to receive letters in the mail….Diane

  4. Although I don’t concur along with you, I discover your shipping and delivery of one’s opinion one that I can essentially locate enjoyable to listen to.My experiences with science and nature have undoubtedly been distinct.I actually admire your considering.I have to choose an opposing watch on “vulcanism”, nevertheless. As a extremely untypical female, We have been informed I am extremely reasonable and analytical. And, just like the regular woman, I’ve triggers that make me cry, but it surely may possibly make you chuckle.I find myself most annoyed and pushed into tears by persons behaving illogically. I last but not least had a boyfriend look at me and say, “That’s just it. People today really don’t make sense largely. It’s important to end expecting them to, and then you will be much less pissed off much less normally.”Just assumed you could get a giggle from me.