Many men and women think men are the better investors. They’re wrong.
After checking how 8 million of its customers did during 2016, Fidelity Investments found that women earned 6.4 per cent on their portfolios. Its male customers made slightly less: 6 per cent.
The difference in performance is small, and it’s always dangerous to make big generalizations out of small slices of data. But it slots in with other research that suggests women tend to take a longer-term view of investing.
They are more likely to buy and hold their investments, and they take fewer risks. Perhaps more importantly, the numbers put into sharp relief how women may be too pessimistic about their own abilities. And that’s a dangerous thing if it discourages them from investing for retirement or other goals.
“When women actually take the step of investing, they do a good job,” says Kathleen Murphy, president of personal investing at Fidelity. “It doesn’t surprise us, but I think it will surprise them. The issue is: How do we get women to have the confidence in themselves to take care of something that is fundamental to their future well-being?”
To check confidence levels, Fidelity asked pollsters to survey about 1,000 investors early this year and ask whether they thought men or women had the better returns in 2016.
Men and women answered roughly the same way. Nearly half of each group thought there would be no difference (49 per cent of men and 47 per cent of women). But among those who guessed that one gender would come out on top, the vast majority said it would be men. Only 9 per cent of women (and 9 per cent of men) said they thought women earned higher returns in 2016.
One of the main reasons for the lack of confidence among women may be the financial services industry itself. It’s one that was created by and, for a long time, run for men. So much so that Sallie Krawcheck, a Wall Street veteran who earlier ran Merrill Lynch and Smith Barney, cited that when she co-founded Ellevest, an online investment adviser that says it helps customers “invest like a woman.”
The disparities run up and down Wall Street. Less than 10 per cent of all U.S. fund managers are women, and the percentage has been on a slow decline since 2008, according to a recent study by Morningstar. Managers attribute much of that to the small percentage of women throughout the financial industry. When relatively few analysts are women, that leaves few potential fund managers.
To better engage with female customers, Fidelity now writes all its promotional materials with an imaginary, 38-year-old target customer in mind. She’s a woman, and her name is Susie.
“Everyone in the company knows Susie and says we need to walk in Susie’s high heels,” Murphy says. “Whether it’s financial planning or saving for retirement or retirement income, we pause and ask if this will meet Susie’s standards.”
Financial companies certainly have an incentive to engage more with women. Divorce rates are rising for older Americans – it’s roughly doubled since the 1990s for those aged 50 and above – which means more women are becoming a sole financial decision maker. And women continue to have longer life expectancies than men. In blunt market terms, that makes them a bigger pool of potential customers.
Fidelity says it has already seen improvements in recent years following its increased outreach to female customers, with more getting their portfolios in better balance. That means they’ve got an appropriate mix of stocks and bonds for their age, rather than being in all cash at a young age or in all stocks during retirement. But there’s still more room for improvement.
“I remember being at an AARP event doing one of these speeches, and I was telling them that I was flying from to D.C. to New York that night to meet with a group of 1,000 millennials,” Murphy says. “So I asked them, ‘What advice should I give millennials, which are your daughters and granddaughters.’ And they said, ‘Tell them to break the cycle. Don’t let this happen to them, too, not being engaged enough. Take control of your future.”’