The Great Lakes are drying up, and it’s going to cost billions

Low water levels would hit tourism and shipping industries hardest, says Mowat Institute

Fishing will be once of the sectors hit hardest by falling water levels in the Great Lakes.

Fishing will be one of the sectors hit hardest by falling water levels in the Great Lakes. (Randen Pedersen/Flickr)

Your lakeside cottage may not be on the waterfront much longer — water levels in the Great Lakes are dropping, and the Mowat Centre says the change could cost $9.61 billion by 2030.

Low Water Blues predicts that tourism and recreational boating and fishing will be the hardest hit sector, losing $12.86 billion by 2050 as vessels are unable to move between lakes and fishing grounds dry up.

Chart showing economic impact of low water levels in the Great Lakes

Preventing water loss in the Great Lakes has been a concern all the way back to the 1920s, but it has become particularly important as the effects of climate change have led to reduced supplies entering the area. Water levels have been below historical averages since the turn of the century, only rebounding slightly last year thanks to increased snowfall and ice coverage.

Ice levels on the lakes rose to their highest since 1979 this winter according to the report, leading to a demand for more icebreakers and significant shipping delays for already-squeezed grain movers. But the real threat to cargo transport comes from dropping water levels, which the Centre estimates will lead to losses to commercial shipping and harbours of $1.18 billion by 2030:

Declines in water levels in the channels as well as harbour entrances could lower available bottom clearance and force shippers to lighten their loads. This could increase the number of trips required to move a given amount of cargo. Longer-term, this could require additional maintenance on existing vessels as well as capital expenditures to increase the fleet, especially with new vessels shaped to operate in shallower conditions. Additional traffic combined with potential shallowing in key harbours may force speed reductions and stoppages in transit, causing delays in delivering cargo.

Dredging may be the only solution available to ensure continued access and transit through the lakes, but it comes with huge capital costs and isn’t without risks. It might be necessary, though—water transport is the only economically viable option for some cargo.

And you might want to consider selling your lake-view cottage sooner rather than later: Ontario summer home sales were up in May, but the report estimates that property values could drop $976 million through 2050.

Residents of the states and provinces around the Great Lakes could face a more existential threat, with 40 million households relying on the basin for their drinking water. It might be time to invest in that desalination plant.

Get our daily briefing on innovation, leadership, technology & the economy.
Weekdays at 6 AM ET. Learn More »

8 comments on “The Great Lakes are drying up, and it’s going to cost billions

  1. Good article.

    But no mention of previous dredging between lakes Erie and Huron. This dredging was to enable large ships to travel between the lakes but it also increased to follow of water from Lakes Huron and Michigan. Ontario hydro and it’s NY partner ha e increased the flow through the Niagara power plants because of this increased quantity of water.

    I assume the increased flow has also increased hydro electricity production between Lake Ontario and the St Lawrence.

    In effect we are mining Michigan and Huron. If we do want The lakes to be around for ‘ever’ then the flow between Huron and Erie has to be controlled so the Lakes water levels are maintained. This may mean less electricity production at Niagara and points east. But this loss wiil be small compared with the loss down the road after Huron and Michigan are no more.

    By the way, I do have a cottage in Tiny Township

  2. Your article is in direct conflict with today’s NY Times article “Creeping Up on Unsuspecting Shores: The Great Lakes, in a Welcome Turnaround” which states: “But after reaching historic lows in 2013, water levels in the Great Lakes are now abruptly on the rise, a development that has startled scientists and thrilled just about everybody with a stake in the waterfront, including owners of beach houses, retailers in tourist areas and dockmasters who run marinas on the lakeshore.”

    “Lakes Michigan, Huron and Superior are at least a foot higher than they were a year ago, and are expected to rise three more inches over the next month. Lake Ontario and Lake Erie are seven to nine inches higher than a year ago.”

  3. Do you know how I avoid duplicate iCal alerts? (Apple support does not, so far…) I think b/c of iCloud calendar sharing involving my husband and that i, I am getting two alerts for every event on the iMac and on the iPhone. anything is up to date and that i have got a new MacBook Pro and the new iPhone 4s.

  4. I drop a comment just about every time I like a article on a website or if I’ve something to valuable to contribute on the conversation. It’s a result in the fire communicated in the submit I browsed. And after reading this guide I had been in fact moved enough to drop a comment here