WASHINGTON - Companies across the U.S. economy are finding ways to do more with fewer workers, dimming hopes that hiring will take off anytime soon.
Employers became leaner and more efficient in the third quarter. Wages, meantime, remain flat or falling. The result is that productivity - output per hour of work - jumped at the fastest pace in six years.
The good news for companies, though, may be bad news for the jobless. As long as companies can get their workers to produce more, they have little reason to hire - at least until consumer spending picks up. And the squeeze on incomes could depress consumer spending, putting the economic recovery at risk.
Still, some economists were encouraged by the productivity report. They say that eventually, employers won't be able to squeeze more from their staffs. They will then have to ramp up hiring - something that could happen next year, even though the jobless rate is expected to hit double digits.
Productivity rose at an annual rate of 9.5 per cent in the July-September quarter, the Labor Department said Thursday. That was much better than the 6.4 per cent gain economists had expected. Unit labour costs fell at a 5.2 per cent rate.
While companies aren't doing much hiring, they're not cutting as many workers, either. The number of newly laid-off workers filing claims for unemployment benefits last week fell to the lowest level in 10 months
The 9.5 per cent productivity rise followed a 6.9 per cent surge in the second quarter and was the fastest since a 9.7 per cent increase in the third quarter of 2003.
The gain reflected that the overall economy, as measured by the gross domestic product, grew for the first time in a year - at an annual rate of 3.5 per cent. The higher output came as companies continued to lay off workers. That meant employers produced more with fewer workers.
The 5.2 per cent drop in unit labour costs marked the third straight decline and was larger than the 4 per cent decrease economists were expecting.
Productivity is the key ingredient to rising living standards. It lets companies pay their workers higher wages. Those increases tend to be financed by increased output, rather than higher costs for products.
But as they struggled with the recession, companies boosted productivity while continuing to lay off workers. Many produced more goods; others kept their output down but slashed costs. Companies kept wages down by freezing pay or imposing unpaid furloughs.
"Survival meant cutting costs as rapidly as possible and fulfilling orders with the fewest number of workers," said Joel Naroff, chief economist at Naroff Economic Advisors.






















