PARIS – International Monetary Fund chief Christine Lagarde faced hours of questioning at a special Paris court Thursday over her role in the 400 million euro ($520 million) pay-off to a controversial businessman when she was France’s finance minister.
The court hearing threatens to sully the reputations of both Lagarde and France. The payment was made to well-connected entrepreneur Bernard Tapie as part of a private arbitration process to settle a dispute with state-owned bank Credit Lyonnais over the botched sale of Adidas in the 1990s. It is seen by many in France as an example of the cozy relationship between big money and big power in France.
The proceedings were expected to continue Friday at the special Paris court that handles cases involving government ministers. Smiling and waving to reporters after more than 12 hours at the court on Thursday, Lagarde said only, “A demain” (“see you tomorrow”) to a person behind her before climbing into a car. She has denied wrongdoing.
Lagarde has earned praise for her negotiating skills as managing director of the IMF through Europe’s debt crisis and is seen as a trailblazer for women leaders. Her decision to let the Adidas dispute go to private arbitration rather than be settled in the courts has drawn criticism, and French lawmakers asked magistrates to investigate.
At a press briefing Thursday in Washington, IMF spokesman Gerry Rice said its executive board, at Lagarde’s request, had already waived her diplomatic immunity to the extent necessary to enable her to appear before French authorities in the case.
“The executive board has been briefed on this matter, including recently, and continues to express its confidence in the managing director’s ability to effectively carry out her duties,” he said.
At the time of the payment, Tapie was close to then-French President Nicolas Sarkozy, who was Lagarde’s boss. Critics have said the deal was too generous to Tapie at the expense of the French state, and that the case shouldn’t have gone to a private arbitration authority because it involved a state-owned bank.
Investigators opened an inquiry in 2011 into possible charges of “complicity to embezzlement of public funds” and “complicity to forgery.” The probe may not result in a trial. If it does, and if Lagarde were to be convicted, she could face up to 10 years in prison, according to prosecutors.
The dispute over the Adidas deal had been dragging through French courts for years, and one question for Lagarde is why the government didn’t let the courts continue to battle it out.
“What she is being criticized for today is taking the disputes between the bank, Mr. Tapie and the French state out of the national court system and submitting them to three private arbitrators, who decided basically behind closed doors how to resolve the dispute,” said Christopher Mesnooh, a lawyer from Field Fisher Waterhouse in Paris who is not connected to the case.
Lagarde and the Washington-based IMF were aware of the probe when she took over as managing director of the fund from Dominique Strauss-Kahn in 2011. The IMF has expressed its confidence in Lagarde throughout the investigation.
In March, French investigators searched Lagarde’s Paris home. Her lawyer said at the time that she welcomed the search as a step toward proving her innocence.
French Finance Minister Pierre Moscovici told Le Monde newspaper this week that the government may seek to annul the arbitration deal if enough evidence emerges of wrongdoing.
Tapie — a flashy tycoon and former football club owner who has also tried his hand as an actor, singer and government minister — insists that he deserved the settlement. He says the investigation into the deal is “bogus,” a politically motivated hunt by the governing Socialists against Sarkozy’s conservatives. Tapie himself may be targeted in a separate probe.
“Lagarde’s fate doesn’t concern me,” Tapie said on Europe-1 radio Thursday.
“When evidence is discovered, then we’ll talk.”
Catherine Gaschka in Paris and Marjorie Olster in Washington contributed to this report.